Fashion rumours confirmed-Christophe Lemaire departs Hermes.


Christophe Lemaire and his depart from Hermes’ creative direction, confirmed a round of last-month rumours that there is a change coming in the House of Hermes.Not that there is such a  difference in sales figures,on the contrary, but the reason provided ”to concentrate on his personal line”, appears..half truth.His full statement was: ” “My own label is growing in an important way and I now really want and need to dedicate myself to it fully.” 

Axel Dumas, Chief Executive Officer of Hermes.stated :”I am very grateful to Christophe for the passion with which he has addressed and enriched the expression of our house in women’s ready-to-wear.Under his artistic direction the métier has renewed its aesthetic and produced very satisfactory financial results. I wish him the greatest success with his own label which is so close to his heart”.

What is crucial to  understand is that Hermes is not a ”one-designer’s”  house,anyone could fit in as long as can follow the guidelines and work creatively on the House’s strong(indeed) dna .Not that Lemaire didn’t do that.But sales turned to focus a bit more on the accessories line rather than the womenswear one.A fresh face will arouse interest about the brand,still any ”newcomer” is expected to be more ”Hermes” and less of his personal style.Unless they somehow collide-and yes i’m thinking Guillaume Henry or perhaps Olivier Theyskens,who recently  parted ways with Theory.Some also bring to the table the name of Isabel Marant,or the idea that Mrs Menkes’ ”outing” of Matthieu Blazy (Maison Martin Margiela) wasn’t irrelevant at all.

We’ll stay tuned with a sense of disappointment as to the actual boundaries a new designer can take the risk to push in such a well-established luxury House such at Hermes.


  1. I won’t be disappointed! Hermès isn’t about pushing the limits per say, it’s about craftsmanship, dedication to traditional and incredible quality. Perhaps Lemaire was too eager to design his own style and it seeped into his designs for Hermès. Like you said there’s a DNA to adhere to.

  2. I think the outing of Matthieu Blazy, while not irrelevant, sort of detached the idea of Maison Martin Margiela being a collective. I respect that times change and it must be wonderful for Blazy to finally receive such exposure, but the Maison is a collective. In this light, it seems to me the dynamic is no longer where the designer is part of the team, but the team is under a designer.

    Whereas Hermes, while not a single-designer brand like Louis Vuitton, is a large and somewhat more intricate structure. A designer leaving isn’t so much of a big deal to me. 7 years is long compared to Margiela’s tenure, which lasted for two, and he was a great accessories designer as much as womenswear. On another note, I agree, I would love Theyskens to design for Hermes (not that I can regularly afford it) but it’s definitely something to look forward to, if possible.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s